Excerpted
from 'Tax Havens of the World'
-
by Walter H. & D.B. Diamond.
TAX EXEMPTIONS AND REDUCTIONS
Once regarded as the Western Hemisphere's primary financial and
trading tax haven, Panama's status as a banking and free trade zone
sanctuary was severely curtailed in the late 1980's because of the
infamous Noriega affair but has since recaptured its prominent position
as one of the most attractive and successful offshore jurisdictions.
By the mid-1990s, Panama's economy had made an impressive recovery
and virtually all of the refugee funds that left the country had
returned while exchange reserves had been restored.
The business community is back to normalcy and new records are
being set in several segments of the economy, including peak revenues
from the enterprising Colon Free Zone and from Canal Zone shipping
traffic. However, the United States Embassy in Panama and several
major multinationals in the United States have criticized the Panamanian
Government for its "monopolistic" markets and "unjust"
treatment of United States investors doing business in Panama.
Gross national product has been averaging an annual increase of
6% in the past few years while the construction industry has been
growing by 60% annually. By 2001, activity in the Colon Free Zone
had grown to exceed $19 billion and handover of the Panama Canal
by the United States, Panama successfully faced the challenges of
running Canal traffic efficiently, widening the 51-mile long waterway
so as to permit large modern ships to sail through, and successfully
developing 535 square miles of land on a commercial rather than
the previous nonprofit basis.
Economic Comeback
After the successful invasion by the United States military forces
to restore democracy to Panama and the return of the previously-elected
government of President Guillermo Endara to control country, Panama
embarked upon rehabilitation of its economy without the hindrance
of General Noriega's presence. One of the first steps taken by the
Government was passage of a law creating incentives for development
of small and micro businesses, exempting them from income, property
and other taxes. The Government has also approved a revised program
to establish export processing zones in which a 20-year exemption
from income tax and exemption from restrictive clauses of the Labour
Code are some of the benefits being offered. The zones were designed
to attract Asian capital. Foreign investment is flowing back, with
China, Hong Kong and Taiwan investing heavily in the first stage
of a major infrastructure and computer project now that the Asian
currency crisis of 1997 has been tamed.
Since Noriega's unlamented departure, about 50,000 new companies
have been formed. The resurgence of Panama's stature as a tax haven
was helped by more than a billion dollars of aid and the repatriation
of hundreds of millions of dollars of refugee funds, which had sought
other sanctuaries. The standstill in offshore banking transactions
and loss of business confidence in Panama's financial status primarily
were responsible for the transfer of domiciles of hundreds of United
States and European multinationals to more politically stable tax
sanctuaries at that time where the redomiciliation laws welcomed
the arrival of companies from other nations. However, the estimated
$30 billion in offshore funds that left Panama has now returned.
The traditionally strong shipping industry had suffered severely
by the transfer of some maritime registries to such other flagship
carriers as the Bahamas, Bermuda, the Cayman Islands, British Virgin
Islands, Liberia, Singapore and Vanuatu but has steadily recovered.
Lifting of the embargo by former President Bush, allowing Panamanian
ships to call at United States ports, finally stopped a heavy outflow.
Panama's New York City Office of Consular and Maritime Affairs,
the only one outside the country empowered to handle safety inspections
and issue licenses, is as busy as ever. Partly because of the political
turmoil in Liberia, for the first time Panama has outranked Liberia
not only in total number of registered vessels but also in total
gross tonnage. The Panama registry has recorded more than 70 million
gross tons compared with Liberia's one-time high of 51 million.
Even before political strife descended upon the Republic, other
shipping alternatives, including pipelines, airlifts and inter-modal
sea-to-rail transport, and growing competition had caused deep concern
in the Panamanian maritime industry.
Banking Recovery
Lifting of sanctions and unfreezing of $400 million of blocked
assets by the United States also eased the road to recovery. United
States banks have reopened and issued new lines of credit for trade.
Unemployment has dropped from 31% to 12%. The trade deficit of $350
million is more than offset by some $800 million of servicing income.
Bank deposits have doubled since 1990.
"A Proposal for Economic Reconstruction" in the hands
of the Government includes substantial amounts of United States
financial aid. The United States Congress initially approved $420
million of aid to Panama, but withheld $80 million until Panama
signed of mutual legal assistance treaty covering tax evasion in
addition to money laundering. After negotiators reached a compromise,
the treaty covering drug dealing and money laundering but not related
to purely fiscal matters generally was disappointing in attaining
the objective as the Government was not as cooperative as hoped
in clamping down on money laundering and drug abuse. Although Panama
was one of the first Caribbean nations to adopt a money laundering
law in 1994, the Administration has been under constant pressure
from the United States, OECD, FAFT, and other world organizations
critical of the Caribbean Islands for being lax in tightening laws
against crime, drug smuggling, and money laundering. In fact, Panama
was declared a "harmful" tax haven in the OECD Report,
placed on the "black list" of the Financial Action Task
Force, and graded "uncooperative" by the Financial Stability
Forum.
Finally, in 2000 Panama adopted four stringent decrees to further
screen out perpetrators of those unsavory devices used by money
launderers around the world. These measures were: (1) Legislative
Assembly Law No. 41 of October 2, 2000, entitled "Capital Laundering"
and amending the Penal Code by imposing harsh penalties of up to
ten years imprisonment for publicly breaching the secrecy of information
or carrying out unlawful transactions related to capital laundering;
(2) Legislative Assembly Law No. 42 of October 2, 2000, setting
down Measures for the Prevention of the Crime of Capital Laundering;
(3) Ministry of the Presidency Decree No. 136 of October 3, 2000,
creating the Financial Intelligence United for the Prevention of
Capital Laundering; and (4) Executive Decree No. 213 of October
3, 2000, amending the 1984 Decree relating to the practice of trusts
and making it compulsory for banks and certain financial institutions
to render information on "suspicious transactions" (see
section on Banking and Foreign Exchange for additional details).
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 end|next
|